The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, commonly known as DACA, has become a pivotal issue in the ongoing immigration debate. Originally created by President Obama in 2012, DACA was a unilateral move that sidestepped Congressional authority. President Trump promised to dismantle it on Day One, but did not do so until September 2017. This delay raised questions about his commitment to uphold constitutional principles and border security.
Trump's Delayed Action on DACA
Despite his initial promise, Trump’s cancellation of DACA was met with immediate legal challenges. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled that while the president has the authority to end the program, he must follow the proper administrative procedures. This ruling, as reported by NPR, left the door open for DACA to remain in place as long as procedural requirements are met.
Biden's Quick Reinstatement of DACA
Upon taking office, President Biden wasted no time reinstating DACA through an executive order. This action, taken on Day One, demonstrated a clear disregard for the procedural complexities that had previously hindered Trump's efforts. The Biden administration's approach appears to prioritize political expediency over constitutional rigor, according to the White House archives.

Presidential Executive Orders: An Overview - NEWS TIPS
Trump's Silence on DACA
Now, with Trump 47 in office for six months, there is an alarming silence surrounding DACA. Despite making significant changes to immigration policy, Trump has not moved to cancel the program that he once vehemently opposed. This raises critical questions about his strategy. Is he viewing DACA as a third rail issue, avoiding it for fear of backlash? Or is he potentially planning to leverage DACA for a more significant political gain?
Two Theories on Trump's Inaction
There are two prevailing theories regarding Trump's hesitance to address DACA. First, he may be avoiding the issue to sidestep the heated backlash that comes with it. The topic of immigration is divisive, and Trump may fear that taking a strong stance could alienate moderate voters.
The second theory posits that Trump is biding his time, potentially using DACA as a bargaining chip for more critical issues, such as immigration reform or border security funding. This could explain why he has not acted decisively against a program that he once labeled as unconstitutional.

Supreme Court's 2023 term a blockbuster for businesses | Reuters
The Implications for Election Integrity and Constitutional Law
The ongoing uncertainty around DACA has significant implications for election integrity and constitutional law. The lack of action on DACA reveals a troubling inconsistency in conservative policy. If Trump's administration cannot decisively tackle DACA, what does that say about its commitment to uphold the Constitution and protect American sovereignty?
Furthermore, these developments raise questions about the integrity of our electoral system. If DACA recipients are allowed to remain in the country without a clear path to citizenship, it could influence future elections in ways that undermine the democratic process.
The Need for a Clear Strategy
Moving forward, it is essential for Trump and his administration to clarify their stance on DACA. Voters deserve a transparent strategy that aligns with constitutional values and prioritizes the American people. Anything less risks further complicating an already fraught immigration landscape.

Video shows protesters invited into DC home in 2020, not 'rioters' in 2023 | Fact check